Khatri vs state of bihar citation
Web7 jun. 2024 · DK Basu, Executive Chairman of Legal Aid Services, West Bengal, a non-political organization on 26/08/1986 addressed a letter to the Supreme Court of India calling his attention to certain news published in the Telegraph Newspaper about deaths in police custody and custody. He requested that the letter be treated as a Writ Petition within the ... WebKhatri_and_Ors_vs_State_of_Bihar_and_Ors_19121980_s810514COM338222 - Read online for free. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. ... Equivalent Citation: AIR1981SC 928, 1981C riLJ597, (1981)1SC C 627, (1981)SC C (C ri)235, [1981]2SC R408.
Khatri vs state of bihar citation
Did you know?
WebKhatri And Others vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 19 December, 1980 Cites 4 docs Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query ( Query Alert Service ). Try out our Premium Member … Web24 aug. 2024 · Tag: Khatri Vs. State of Bihar CrPC Principles of Fair Trial and CrPC (Trial Stage) By Hemant More August 24, 2024 No Comments I ndian Legal System > Criminal Laws > CrPC > Principles of Fair Trial and CrPC (Trial Stage) It is always said that “justice should not only be done, but it should appear to have been done”.
Web5 aug. 2024 · State of Bihar, (1962), upheld the constitutionality of Section 124A and held it to be in harmony with Article 19 (1) (a). Facts In this case, Kedar Nath Singh, a member of the Forward Communist Party, had taken on the … Web12 okt. 2024 · Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 10 March, 1981. Citations: [1981 AIR 1068], [1981 SCR (3) 145], [1981 SCC (2) 493], [1981 SCALE (1)531] …
WebKhatri 1 Appellant VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR Respondents JUDGEMENT - (1.) These seventeen petitioners in the two Writ Petition who are under trial prisoners in the central Jail, Bhagalpur complain that they have been deprived of their eyesight by the police while they were in police custody after their arrest in connection with certain criminal cases. WebHe conceded that it was undoubtedly laid down by this Court in State of Bihar v. J.A.C. Saldhana (supra) that the State Government has power to direct investigation or further …
Web27 aug. 2024 · M.H. Hoskta V. State of Maharashtra: Citation: AIR 1978 SCC 1548, (1978) 3 SCC 544. Year of the case: 1978: Appellate: M.H.Hoskta: Respondent: State of …
Web1 feb. 2024 · It plays a major role in avoiding the miscarriage of justice. An accused cannot be denied a speedy trial simply on the ground that he failed to claim it. Hussainara … fll to idahoWeb6 jun. 2024 · It is the most famous case which discusses the human rights of prisoners in India. The honourable Supreme Court pointed out that the State must ensure free legal aid and a speedy trial for the administration of justice. Citation: 1979 AIR 1369 Court: Supreme Court of... 6 Jun 2024 3:50 AM GMT fll to ind google flightsWebKhatri And Others (V) v. State Of Bihar And Others Supreme Court Of India Judgment Law CaseMine CITATION CODES citation codes CASE NO. Writ Petition No. 5670 of 1980, decided on November 25, 1982. ATTORNEY (S) K. Hingorani, Advocate, for the Petitioner; G.S Misra, Advocate, for the Respondent; A. Subashini, Advocate, for the … great harbour 74Web(1) Sri Khatri reached Ranchi on 16-10-77, and stayed at South Eastern Hotel. He left on 17-10-77. He paid Rs. 72/- only as lodging charges to the hotel but dishonestly charged Rs. 120/- from NMDC in his T.A bill. (2) He reached Ranchi on 18-10-77 stayed in the same Railway hotel and left on 19-10-77. great harbour cay bahamas real estateWebThe decisions in Khatri v. State of Bihar (1981) 1 SCC 627; Veena Sethi v. State of Bihar AIR 1983 SC 339; Rudul Sah v. State of Bihar AIR 1983 SC 1086; Bhim Singh v. State … fll to idaho fallsWeb1 sep. 2024 · Supreme Court of India Khatri & Ors. Etc vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 10 March, 1981 Equivalent citations: 1981 AIR 1068, 1981 SCR (3) 145 Author: P … great harbor yacht club nantucket maWeb27 feb. 2024 · In Khatri v. State of Bihar,[16] the Court declared that the State had the constitutional mandate to provide free legal assistance to an accused person, that he could not obtain legal services because of the indigence, and that everything that was necessary for this purpose must be done by the State. great harbor jost van dyke things to do