WebfC) Danial Latifi v. UOI D) Shayara Bano v. UOI 22) Pronouncing triple talaq is made an offence by which act A) The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act ,2024 B) The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 C) The Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 D) None of the above WebNov 1, 2024 · The present case shows that absence of a uniform civil code in the country has made the Christians suffer discrimination for more than five decades. The main question dealt by Supreme Court in this case was that whether Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is discriminatory and unconstitutional. Facts of the case
Law essay - 1570 Words Studymode
Web3. The argument is that the rationale of Section 125 CrPC is to off- set or to meet a situation where a divorced wife is likely to be led into destitution or vagrancy. Section 125 CrPC is … WebDanial Latifi v. Union of India Under Islamic law maintenance or Nafaqa (Nafqa) arise out of three reasons - i) marriage ii) relations and iii) property. Maintenance in this context … stein fillers long beach
Family Laws In Sarla Mudgal Vs Union Of India - Studymode
WebFathimnurisa, 1990 Cr.L.J. 1364; Abdul Rashid v. Sultana Begum, 1992 Cr.L.J. 76; Abdul Haq v. Yasima Talat; 1998 Cr.L.J. 3433; Md. Marahim v. Raiza Begum, 1993 (1) DMC 60. Thus preponderance of judicial opinion is in favour of what we have concluded in the interpretation of Section 3 of the Act. The decisions of the High Courts referred to ... WebJul 15, 2024 · Case Brief Danial Latifi & Anr. Versus Union of India Petitioner- Danial Latifi & Anr. Respondent- Union of India Statutes Referred- The Muslim Women (Protection of … WebJan 2, 2024 · In the case of Danial latifi and others V UOI [3], the constitutional validity of the above-mentioned act was challenged, saying that especially section 3 (1) (a) of the act violated section 14 of the constitution. However the court upheld the validity of the Act. pinnacle mech services